King James Bible
King James Version (KJV)


Viewing page: 2935 of 6006
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
:?D
You are correct. A person does not have to learn Greek and Hebrew to understand the English bible, and I would never tell anyone that. I believe it is a great tool for studying. It has helped me a lot. But that is just for me personally. I would never tell you or anyone else that they need to learn Greek. I think it would be great if we all knew it, but again, that's an individual's choice. If Greek offends you, I would for sure stay away from it.
I was simply trying to give an accurate representation of where faith comes from. If there is anything in my answer to the original question that you see in error, please let me know. If I may ask, you say that the King James Bible is "the literal translation." How do you know that? Like most English Bibles, it is a translation from Greek. So how do you know it is "the literal translation" without just taking someone's word for it?
I have absolutely nothing negative to say about the King James Bible. It is the only English bible I fully trust, and it is the only one I use in my study. I believe it to be the most accurate translation. But it is a translation. And as far as Greek goes, I don't have the time to sit down with the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible and do a side by side, word for word check to see if it is a "literal translation." So just like you, I'm stuck with just taking someone's word for it that the translators made no errors.
We don't know if Orpha was married to Mahlon or Cilion. It is a mistake to suggest we do.
The bible does not explicitly say. 50% chance it is true, but the bible does not tell us.
Just like Shem, Ham & Japheth- it would be an error to think Shem is the oldest.
Thank you
Jesus reigns
Also, When Jesus raised from the Death He should have presented himself to the Roman government who condemned him to be crucified and the Jewish High priest that asked the Government to crucify Jesus. If He showed himself were it counts, the people of planet Earth would have accepted Christianity as their sole religion. The first one to see him was Maria Madeleine and some other unidentified women why?
There is nothing wholesome in the minds of people who use Christian historical writings to reinforce such twisted beliefs.
Go out and do good works to help some of the people you have harmed and feel healthy in the burden lifted from your twisted souls.
I was doing a whole big study on Lucifer because there's so much schism about it.
But now I think there's too much Bible left in the New Testament alone, that deserves as much comment and explanation to 2020's people. Just today I ran over my favorite dog (spirits) verse, but I lost it again :/ kinda brutal.
I urge you to avoid this sort of stuff as they are just added to the great list of other groups & cults that have attempted to put dates on future biblical events & have failed. Just look at the many attempts by the JWs. The Scriptures urge us to be ready for the Lord's coming, to keep short accounts with Him, & be watchful. There will be world events that will show us that time is getting short (keep your eyes peeled on Israel & Jerusalem), but to put a date & time on these events, is very unwise indeed.
I had to research "Moab". Wikipedia gives a good account of it if for nothing else, to get you started into further research.
Apologies, I did mean Gen 4:16 (finger trouble). So, to briefly respond to your questions:
a. Cain & Abel's responsibilities: in their own farm & flocks; v 4 implies that Abel offered from HIS flock, as taking an animal from another flock would amount to stealing, unless permission was given.
b. Cain feared for his life: it could be he was talking about the future when in the passage of time, these others would seek out his life.
c. No idea who Nod was, just know it as shown in v 16. One can assume that the city was not the only one, or maybe it was the only one at that time.
d. Satan's accepting God's limits on him. 1:12 "all that he HATH" & 2:5,6 "upon his BODY". Life & death are the prerogative of God alone ( Deut 32:39; 1 Sam 2:6), that even Satan can't intrude into. That Satan was limited only to Job's possessions, & later, to affecting his body, was God's limit to the extent of influence upon Job. Whether Satan would have attempted to take Job's life as well, though would be unsuccessful, is arguable, but for the declaration by God to not go that far or to attempt to go that far.
e. Lk 22:31: not "asked" but "desired" to sift you as wheat. That's Satan's prerogative: to do as he wishes with us, except for the bounds set by God. I sometimes wonder what would be our state on Earth, if Satan had unlimited access to our lives.
f. Satan asking permission to go after Peter. He didn't ask for permission. To go after Adam. Again, no permission asked for. About the demoniac: to go into swine. Yes, permission was asked for, they're in subjection/limited ( Lk 10:17). I couldn't get the gist of the remaining part of your comment on Job 38, as to the connection to Permission, since God was speaking to Job about His Greatness & Power. Of course, if Satan indeed asked permission against Adam & Peter, then I could understand from where you're coming.
There is still beauty when life hurts.
Discuss what is the 2ND DEATH?
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Lots of WOES in that chapter. Better stay away from that ...
The Bride of Christ is male, female, young, old, children; Born again deceased, pre-born.
Don't buy any of their books...