Viewing page: 432 of 6006
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
You said "I would say any false literature or added literature to intentionally change the word of God in a way to loose the virtue intended yes that is what one may call leaven and ye perhaps demonic"
I'm not sure if you saw the examples comparing a few verses in the KJB and the Niv in one of my comments to Jesse so here's a couple of them.
In the KJB ( Dan. 3:25) It tells us "the fourth is like the Son of God"
In the Niv the same verse says "the fourth looks like a son of the gods"
(Do you think the Niv looses the virtue intended by saying (the fourth looks like a son of the gods)? It was truly the Son of God!
(This to me sounds like intentional deception rather than a translation problem!)
In the KJB ( Col. 1:14) It tells us "In whom we have redemption, THROUGH HIS BLOOD, even the forgiveness of sins".
In the Niv the same verse says "In whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins".
The Niv leaves out the words (THROUGH HIS BLOOD).
(Do you think the Niv looses the virtue intended by leaving out the words (through his blood)?
In the KJB ( Luke. 4:4) It tells us "It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God".
In the Niv the same verse says "Jesus answered, It is written: Man does not live by bread alone".
The Niv leaves out the words (but by every word of God)
Jesus Christ tells us that we should live by ((EVERY WORD OF GOD)). And the Niv takes that away.
( Proverbs. 30:5-6) Tells us "Every word of God is pure".
Do you think these intentional changes in the Niv are loosing the virtue intended by God?
Do you think these changes would fall in that category as being demonic?
I would say YES to both questions!
The Niv bible is not Inspired by God, these changes alone should prove that!
How many more changes like these could there possibly be in the whole Niv to deceive people?
Thank you Spencer. God Bless you.
The subject in ( 2 Pet. 1:19) is a ((more sure word of prophecy)).
( 2 Pet. 1:20) Tells us "Knowing this first, that ((no prophecy of the scripture is of any (private) interpretation))".
The word (prophecy) is #4394; it means prediction, (scriptural or other)
The word (private) is #2398; it means pertaining to self, i.e. one's own, by implying private or separate.
( 2 Pet. 1:21) Tells us "For (the prophecy) (came not in old time) (by the will of man): but holy men of God spake ((as they were moved by the Holy Ghost))".
The (prophecy) is the Word of God.
( Rev. 1:1-3) v3 Tells us "Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this ((prophecy)) and keep those things which (are written therein): for the time is at hand.
They hear the words of this ((prophecy)) this verse also tells us "and keep those things ((which are written)) therein".
( Rev. 22:7) Tells us "blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book".
So that prophecy is written in a book. The prophecy in ( 2 Pet. 1:21) that came to us by holy men of God!
That is how we got the King James Bible.
Now you asked "Did the men who gave us the KJB translation have the original letters when they were translated?"
They spake as they were ((moved by the Holy Ghost)) so I would say God was in complete control of whatever was used to keep His Words pure. The Holy Ghost would have been the translator, using the men.
Jesse if the modern version bibles are the doctrines of devils in ( 1 Tim. 4:1) do you think it would be edifying, comforting, and helpful to get people to see that truth?
In ( 2 Tim. 4:3-4) v3 tells us of the time (they will not endure sound doctrine). v4 Tells us "And they shall (turn away their ears from the truth), and shall be turned unto fables".
I'll end it with that. Reply only if you want to. Thanks Jesse, God Bless.
I simply want him to take me. I dont want to do it myslef and I dont want to suffer anymore.
I also (as GiGi) understand where you are coming from. I also agree with her that we need to move on to other topics. Something Jema said made a lot of sense also where she said "I just wonder why, when there are so many awesome things, edifying and encouraging and comforting things that we could be posting on here, things that would potentially be helpful and comforting to others, our brothers and sisters in Christ, are any of us talking about a different translation on here. Have we really nothing better to post?"
You cherish the KJB, and I cannot fault you for that. As I said, it is my bible of choice. However, I am not a KJB only believer. There are a few other English translations that I believe to be very good translations, just like the King James is a good translation. I chose the King James because I believe it to be more accurate than other English translations. But it is not a perfect translation. What is most important to me is the salvation of others, not what bible translation they read. Whatever bible a person chooses to read from is between them and the Lord.
You are telling me that God used holy men of God to translate the KJB in 1611 ( 2 Pet. 1:19-21)? If that is what you are saying, then I would have to say that that is a complete misapplication of 2 Peter 1:21. The "holy men of God" in that verse has nothing to do with the men who translated the King James Bible.
I do like your analogy of the original letter always being the original. That is a great analogy with an emphasis on original. My question is: Did the men who gave us the KJB translation have the original letters when they were translating? Again, I agree with GiGi. Unless you can find someone that wishes to compare and discuss the KJB vs all other translations, I would move on to another topic.
again, thanks for your reply and no it's there's no reason for me to get upset over this misunderstanding.
I haven't put much time towards the site of recent and haven't followed the original thread.
Let's be clear, I use the KJV.
However to answer a few of your questions,
I would say any false literature or added literature to intentionally change the word of God in a way to loose the virtue intended yes that is what one may call leaven and yes perhaps demonic.
However false or demonic "doctrine" comes from the interpreter or teacher from any Bible, as well as the king James.
Doctrine is what you build out of the scripture whether it's faulty scripture or not. "A belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a Church, political party, or other group."
What I was saying in regards to Brother Jesse's post was that I wouldn't go to the extreme of denying anyone's access to a Church unless they possessed a King James Bible.
I believe God planned well ahead of Satan's traps and schemes. He gave us the Holyspirit to teach us and spread his message to us abroad.
Isaiah 28:9-10 "Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; HERE A LITTLE, AND THERE A LITTLE:
There are groups out there that change the bible they use completely to fit their Doctrine. "New World Translation" is one.
God's word is perfect.
Translations imperfect.
A fruitless false teacher is worst, no matter what Bible he has.
Because the Doctrine he adhere to haven't brought fruit in his life.
You shall know them by their fruits. Matthew 7:15-16.
It doesn't say you shall know them by their Bible.
There are tares amongst us and their Bible is just like ours! They attempt to lure one away from the truth which is Christ.
GBU.
Thanks for the reply.
I will get back to you at the end of the work day.
God bless
Who is the beast speaking blaspheme? and what does the horns represent?
you mentioned Daniel 7 and revelation 13. and who is the dragon giving this
beast power?
Jesus spoke in a parable or illustration. and then explained what would happen after his parable.
What does this all mean? Is this really happening today? Matthew 13:34,47-50
it is Jehovah's ( psalm 83:18) will for believers to understand and bear fruit.
2Timothy 3:15-17; Matthew 7:7,8; Mark 4:20; John 17:3
his motives was for man and woman to take care of the earth. to enjoy his
creation, to take care of the animals. to enjoy the richness that the earth provided.
he created the ground to give in abundance, so that poverty was impossible. God
started the earth in the garden of Eden. Jehovah and the heavens was his the main
authority to mankind according to Genesis 1,2. there were no kings, rulers in the beginning.
But this happened to mankind: Genesis 3; Genesis 6; Genesis 19; Job 1,2; Luke 4:1-13
it just getting worse and worse. 2Timothy 3:1-7
It's a heavenly war, and a invisible war ( Revelation 12:7-13) we humans may not understand but God has revealed it to us in human terms. although the innocent are dying because of 1 John 5:19. WE KEEP THE HOPE AS GOD WANTS US TO: Romans 15:4-6; Revelation 21:3-5
We continue in the hope. Job 14:14
IF YOU READ ALL THESE SCRIPTURES YOU WILL SEE WHY MANKIND ARE SUFFERING.
I HOPE THIS ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION.
"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:"
This very clearly shows that the Earth cannot be flat... Circle of the Earth...
......Listen to what Jesus is telling us in John 6:65....Its the 2 nd time he tells us this...NO MAN CAN COME UNTO ME UNLESS IT IS GIVEN UNTO HIM OF MY FATHER ( THE LIVING WORD ) not the written word the letter a killer....If the written word cd have redeemed humanity then Jesus shed his blood in vain and the CROSS, Calvary was just foolishness...Its only by the love of God and the regeneration of the H.G. that we are redeemed....God so loved the world that he gave us his only son....We all love the kjv but its a lesser light.....Only Christ is the LIGHT OF THE WORLD.
That is including ALL sons of men and ALL blasphemies they may utter, provided of course they repent from their sins.
But he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit NEVER has forgiveness but is subject to eternal condemnation. Daniel 7: verse 8 and 11 show us who is the one without forgiveness: the beast speaking pompous words and he was slain, and its body destroyed and given to the burning flame.
Also in Rev 13:5 "And he was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies, and he was given authority to continue for
42 months. Then he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name, His tabernacle and those who dwell in heaven.
Always be ready and testify of Jesus Christ, His reward is more than this. Take care of you all, love you in Christ.
1 Corintihans 12 and 13 chapter
You said "You may have to dig deeper with Improper translation, and sometimes that's just a matter of turning a few pages".
If its a Improper translation then that would be what ( 2 Tim. 4:3-4) is warning us about ((not being)) ((sound doctrine)) in the Lastdays!
That could also be what ( 1 Tim. 4:1) is warning us about "Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that ((in the latter times)) some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and ((doctrines of devils))". If its a Improper translation that would mean its not God's Word, but could be, and more than likely would one of those doctrines of devils. Right?
You also said "Revelation of the word of God and its message is spreading throughout the entire Bible. When there is error, The scripture should straighten itself out".
Do you believe if a Bible version is one of the doctrines of devils in ( 1 Tim. 4:1) it would straighten itself out?
The word (doctrines) is #1319; it means instruction (the function or the information) doctrine, learning, teaching.
(So our doctrine today is whatever Bible we learn from or teach from. ((It is our Biblical instruction)), that means we will have some Bibles in the latter times (today) that are doctrines of devils. (It would seem these are created to deceive if its a doctrine of devils because it causes some to depart from the faith)
Where could these doctrines of devils possibly be today? Modern version Bibles is the answer to that question.
They change the Words of the living God ( Jer. 23:36) The word (perverted) means to change.
You said "when there is error"? A Bible with errors ((would be one of those doctrines of devils)) that change the Word of God. also what ( 1 Tim. 4:1) warns us about in the latter times?
There are no errors in the KJB it is the pure, preserved Word of God.
Please don't be offended Spencer. ( Eph. 4:25) ( Gal. 6:1) ( Proverbs. 27:17)
God Bless you Spencer.