King James Bible
King James Version (KJV)


Viewing page: 911 of 6482
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
My understanding is that the NIV is a thought for thought translation (called dynamic equivalent). The NIV took the Greek text and translated the verse to express the entire thought of the verse.
The NASB, ESV, KJV, NKJV and a newly released one LSV is a word for word translation (called formal equivalent).
Other Bibles are paraphrases such as the Living Bible, the Message, Good News Bible.
Hope this helps. It is easy for one to find this info on the internet by entering "Types of Bible Translations".
I don't think we should spend any more time talking about the devil, Lucifer. Just as a final comment to close this discussion, Lucifer was the name given by Romans to the brightest star that is seen in the sky at dawn. It's exact meaning is "light bringer". So that star for ancient people indicated the begining of the day. So it was the morning star. Through Latin that word entered the English language. And whereas in English it doesn't mean anything, it is just a name, in Latin though it means "morning star". So some Bibles either use the name lucifer and other the name morning star, both names are right. In Isaiah God does a comparison between the former state of devil as an angel of light, a morning star, that he was before revolting against God and his latter state when he became a dark devil. That it is all about. So don't be embarrassed about the name.
Now about the NIV Bible, I also noticed that sometimes it omits words or phrases. I have done a research on the internet and I found out that the NIV relies on the so called "critical editions" of the Bible. The KJB uses the so called "Reiceived Text". I haven't checked if the NIV is an exact translation of the critical edition, so I don't really know about it's validity. I think one can check those things. On the net there is much information for and against that translation, so one can decide for themselves. I am not the proper person to do that since I mainly use the Greek Bible. The greek Bibles almost always use the Received Text or the so called Patriarcal text that the Greek Orthodox church accepts as right. It is almost indentical to the Received text.
About translations, it is not bad that there are adapted to the speaking language of people of any time. As long as they don't depart from the initial meaning of the text, there is no problem. But we can always check that and so we can select the right translations to read from. Actually not all of them are good. GBU
Most prophecies; however have at least a dual fulfillment or there are near and far implications in the same passage. Such is the case when Christ read from the scroll from Isaiah 61 he stopped after verse 1. Verse 2 talks about the vengeance of God which is tied into His second coming. Therefore many of His own people didn't recognize who He was because they were looking at prophecies of His Messianic Millennial reign rather than the purpose of atonement and death before the Resurrection into glory.
This "near and far" application is one complexity; another is what applies only to covenental promises for the nation of Israel; what applies to the church alone and what has some dual application. Galatians 3:28 shows how Jew and Gentile are incorporated into the church; and verses such as Galatians 3:7 show how not all Israel are true Israel but only the remnant believers. The church basically IS the true Israel as are the subset of Abraham's seed that are believers.
I find the best rule is to see what scriptures are mentioned in Acts in particular as applying to the church in the deepest sense of the meaning. That is the only way to understand the deepest or final meaning to certain prophecies. What we can't do is make the error of making all prophecy figurative that doesn't fit into our doctrinal picture; or dismissing the covenants that were promised to Israel. That is a subject perhaps for another commentary.
Perhaps an individual application would be from Romans 8:30. It isn't a prophecy as traditionally labeled; but the time frame of predestination guarantees that those who are saved will eventually be glorified after sanctification. All prophecy shows God's certain plans.
Aaron's sin was basically equivalent to a death penalty; breaking the 1st commandment; and with the sexual things implied many other things deserving such an end such as is indicated in verses 6 and 25. Poor Moses had to go another 40 days fasting after his first fast; and acted as intercessor then and several other times when God wanted to destroy the whole lot of the exiles and start anew. In the end only Caleb and Joshua from that generation survived; all the rest that made it into the Promised Land were the children of the original families that came out of Egypt.
Moses also had to deal with Miriam when she made a fuss about his Ethiopian wife in Numbers 12:10. Aaron could have been more proactive in dealing with it before her leprosy came as punishment.
This should serve as a warning to all; especially when a great spiritual victory has just happened such as a genuine move of God. Rebellion is as witchcraft ( 1 Samuel 15:23); and stems from the same root of corruption. This is why we can't just proclaim we are Christians without evidence of trust in God; fear of the Lord and other such good fruit being evident. We also must choose God over popular opinions.
Men love war, more then they do women. If there is NO God, then the brutal and cruelty of war is the the fault of man's own free will. But if there is a God, then why would that blame shift from man to God if the state of free will still exist?
The Bible is a history of man's sin for his love of war. God doesn't embrace the evil, he eliminates it in his own time (weapons to plow shields). Many societies in the Bible were beyond the hope of accepting God's scripture of salvation (a pillar of salt), that God in his righteousness against evil exterminated the whole population...such that those people still had hope of salvation in the presence of God's judgement upon the dead.
1 Corinthians 15:33,34
Acts 15:28,29; Exodus 26:1
POINT: Revelation 22:6-9;
Revelation 4:11
is a key example. Exodus 4:4-9
Despite the evidence, refused to
believe. Exodus 9:27-30; Exodus 9:33-35
Denying Jesus was blaspheming against
the spirit. John 1:14-18; Matthew 5:17,18; Matthew 7:28,29
and refusing his father in heaven who sent
Jesus also. Matthew 3:16,17; John 3:14-18
God in heaven Sees. 1 Samuel 16:7
Jesus who was chosen by Jehovah- psalm 83:18
Who is the one Chosen by God to bring salvation- John 3:16,17
never glorified himself. Matthew 22:36,37 but with the glory
and honor and title God gave to him, he spoke. John 5:19
Matthew 23:8-12; LUKE 1:28-33; Isaiah 9:6,7
I am so happy to hear that your gums and mouth are healing well. I know well how painful tooth and gum pain can be when something is amiss with them. I pray that the infection is completely gone and will not return. I pray that your tissues in your mouth heal up thoroughly without any further problems.
May the Lord bless you today, Stephanie!
I will be glad to pray for your family and your job search.
I am glad to pray for Shelley and You.