King James Bible
King James Version (KJV)


Viewing page: 1319 of 5178
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
perhaps you might be thinking about Psalms 91
1He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
2I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.
3Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
4He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
5Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
6Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
7A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
how we are protected is not said but if he gives us a vaccine to help us its not a lack of faith to get it...
remember the story bout the guy who died and went to heaven and asked "lord why didn't you save me?" Jesus answered him "not save you? I sent 2 boats and a helicopter before you died"
remember we walk by faith
Isaiah 45:23
I have sworn by myself[god], the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.
Romans 14:11
For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
you have to admit it if Paul believed this how true must it be?
You have brought truth to the table several times. May all listen and learn.
Matthew 1:16 Jesus' lineage is connected to Jacob which eventually relates Jesus to Solomon rather than Nathan. One conventional explanation for these differences, from as early as John of Damascus, is that Nathan is the ancestor of the Virgin Mary, while Solomon is the ancestor of Mary's husband Joseph.
Keep me in your heart.
I would answer yes to that. In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke Chapter 16, the rich man had died and was in Hades and he was in torments. Now, beginning at verse 25, Abraham says to the rich man, remember in your lifetime that you received good things and Lazarus received evil things? So the rich man must have had memory of his life.
So then down in verses 27 and 28, the rich man asks that Abraham would send someone to his father's house to testify to his brothers and warn them so they would not come into this same place of torment that the rich man was in.
It is interesting that he has the remembrance of his past life on earth. He remembers his family. He remembers his brothers. And he says, father Abraham, send somebody to testify to them so that they will not come to this place of torment.
I would like to share my thoughts on verses 3 and 4. First, to answer the question on whether or not Jesus responded appropriately. I'm one of those people that believe everything Jesus did was perfect, so I would have to answer yes to that.
Now for verses 3 and 4:
Verses 3 and 4 is the first of three temptations. But let me say this first, that even though Satan was tempting Jesus, He could never give in to temptation. Satan starts off by saying, "If thou be the Son of God, command these stones be made bread."
If I may share some technical information with you, the word "if" in the Greek text is what is called the first class condition assumed to be true. It should be translated "since." But please know that when Satan was tempting Jesus, he was not tempting Him to prove that He was the Son of God.
Satan is saying (since) you are the Son of God, then do this: Misuse your authority. Misuse your position. Be disobedient to your heavenly Father. But please note that Satan is not asking Jesus to prove Himself to be the Son of God, but actually questioning Him, baiting Him to disobey the commandments of God.
Jesus answers in verse 4, which is a quote from Deuteronomy 8:3. He says man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from out of the mouth of God. So this was what Jesus said when Satan tried to tempt Him by saying, you are hungry, right? You see these stones? Turn them into bread, satisfy your hunger, since you are the Son of God.
Elsewhere I believe it was you that commented the reason the gospels keep talking about demon possession, is that they had no tenable theory for disease in that age, and thus blamed demons for everything. And then I think you said Matthew's gospel was very much a product of its times in this regard.
So comments like that made me think you had a much more extensive background (e.g. also your comments on Moby Dick quoting scripture, etc.)
As far as Matthew, I'll pose a conundrum to you, that occurred to me just last week. Both Mark and Luke have Jesus floating up in the air to ostensibly go back to Heaven at the end of their gospels. Luke says that all eleven apostles witnessed this, and then alludes to it again at the beginning of Acts. Luke was of course just quoting others and almost certainly not a personal witness of this. And neither of the apostolic gospels (Matthew and John) have anything to say about it.
Go read the last chapter of Matthew and explain why he would not even mention such a spectacular event, which Luke asserts Matthew was a personal witness of. This is the sort of thing that really wrecks some people's faith. It doesn't mine, for well considered reasons. Even if the gospels are not "infallible" in the way most Christians affirm as a matter of faith, you can still read them and discern a pretty impressive reality underlying them all. We don't need infallible witnesses for anything else in history. And Jesus own words I think bespeak of his divinity -- as it says in John I think, "No man ever spoke as this man did."
Both Cain and Abel.
The seed is the same in both these children! Abel and Cain WERE BORN from the same Father. Adam! So why did God Favor Abel, over Cain? If sin is sin ,why could God have favor over one of another? Both are sons!
When God had to kill animals to cover Adam and eve, not only from the nakedness , but the weather that would soon change! The only creatures on the earth were those that God created! Can U imagine How He must have felt at, killing his own creation, having to change the plan! The evil angels came out of the disobedience and are the byproduct of it. In the beginning it was not so, everything was perfect and good!
What we don't know is what infuriated Cain to kill his brother. I will speculate that it had to do with property. The toil and hard work to clear land, plant ,and wait for an harvest, still unpredictable as even today!
If, Abel didn't watch his animals , they more than likely would have been found in Cain's crops?
So! The evolution of sin. It divides and will divide until the end, multiplying. It Will not procreate, but only in mans heart!
The evolution of mans depravity was not introduced from an outside creature. Everything was perfect even from the beginning! Sin was born into man through disobedience, the same seed that is in all of us was in Cain and ABEL. The unpredictable sin in man, God would find a way to control, it would be controlled by the law, Given through the faith of one called Moses! The dispensation of sin became evident even from one generation to another! This is why we see these generations in the scriptures! Boring as it may seem, every t and every I must be crossed! You are correct we should search the scriptures, sometimes reading between the lines can be dangerous, especially if you have not lived life! Instead looked out a window and assuming that their is life outside what our God has created ,is dangerous!
Jesus was not perfect, he came in the likeness of sinful flesh; But he was GIVEN the SPIRIT without MEASURE. This is how he could walk in the flesh and not sin. If he had only been given the down payment as we are given, he would have sinned as we do. If we were GIVEN the SPIRIT without MEASURE; NOW as he was, we could walk in the flesh and not sin.
We are only GIVEN the down payment NOW; but when we leave this body of flesh and put on the body of Christ (incorruption and immortality) we ALSO will be GIVEN the SPIRIT WITHOUT MEASURE.
When we return (second resurrection); with Christ, to judge the world; we will be able, as Christ, to walk in flesh and not sin. To judge the world in RIGHTEOUSNESS. We will be the FULLNESS of Christ.
I happen to believe they got it right ! And the American Bible society that was instrumental in taking it out 250 years got it wrong . End of story for me .
With all you people that seem to know so much can you find the verse that certainly is in the KJV ? God speaking said , I have no flesh that I should forget , something like that . A young lady that have been a believer for only 1 yr can recall reading it too , but can not recall the place , I have read it at least 3 times but recalling it in location book ch and verse , I'm not good at that . If a person has not even read it I wonder how much Bible they even have . Please supply the Book chapter and verse thanks my original question !
Dearest JESUS sets a benchmark then we follow Him. If you choose to go the other way around, unfortunately, you'll be hell-bound.
Matthew 19:21
"Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me."