Viewing page: 267 of 269
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
--where in crackers did this theory derive from? --i have studied tons of philosophers and heard tons of philosophy down through the years,--have heard tons of ministers, theologians and scientists alike--but ah, never, ever have i heard anything close to your theory AT ALL. where do the origins of this come from? what belief systems embrace your statements?
1:3 And God said...
1:6 And God said...
1:9 And God said...
1:11 And God said...
1:14 And God said...
1:20 And God said...
1:24 And God said...
1:26 And God said...
1:29 And God said...
If God said it, that settles it.
the opportunity to read the passage or chapter first. Than I can answer the questions testing my
knowledge with the bible.
If someone is not serving God in their heart, their oath to serve God through their marriage might be insincere and then divorce by being corrupt and weak.
But if the sinner should divorce, then gain a new life in Christ and love again, he or she can make an oath of marriage that is bond up in God due to the conviction in the heart.
That is how I believe that marriages are blessed and how God holds the individuals accountable.
If someone is not serving God in their heart, their oath to serve God through their marriage might be insincere and then divorce by being corrupt and weak.
But if the sinner should divorce, then gain a new life in Christ and love again, he or she can willimgly make an oath of marriage that is bond up in God due to the conviction in the heart.
That is how I believe that marriages are blessed and how God holds the individuals accountable.