Questions as to why specific writings became 'apocrypha' and subsequently removed from the original KJV is simply that content therein cemented the foundation of the word giving greater understanding. A time for everything and everything has a time.
You are replying to a comment by "Charlie Slaves"
If you read from Genesis to Revelation their is a common theme. The Promise seed Genesis 3:15, Israel Gods chosen people , The coming one the messiah, Israel's disobedience and captivity, Jehovah ( Psalm 83:18) mercy and delivering his people from captivity because they repented. Even the book of Ruth played a part in the symbolic descendant role in the promise seed
Matthew 1:5.
How does the book of Esther add up? this book talks about Jews being in Shushan. The Jews were always in captivity by their enemies for their deliberate disobedience to Jehovah- Nehemiah 13:23-31; Esther 2:6 (Exile). Esther didn't have a choice; she was in exile or in captivity as while and taken to the kings house- Esther 2:8. Jehovah god blessed this situation because they relied on him when Haman tried to scheme or plot to destroy all the Jews Esther 3:5-15. This book is accurate because it matches the other books regarding Jews being in captivity or exile.
When you read the apocrypha does it match the bibles overall theme? does this puzzle pieces match?
Proverbs 14:34 comes to mind in this chapter. Here we see the beginning of a process which God Himself had "set up" to accomplish His purposes. Mordecai supervised Esther; and told her NOT to reveal that she was a Jew. This affiliation with her people was to have enormous implications that can hardly be overstated; and she later had to be prodded to risk her own life and reveal these things once the plot of Haman was concocted and the King's edict rendered.
Titus 2:3-5 also is relevant here; as is 1 Peter 3:6 among other verses which show God's plan for women to be exalted.
The record of Mordecai of the attempted assault of the two chamberlains showed how the Jews were to be commended for helping with the security of the King; and this record would help the "humble to be exalted" as it were at a later date to vindicate Mordecai. (see ( Matthew 23:12). This attitude of service was repeated with Daniel in exile in Persia under Nebuchadnezzar; and Joseph in Egypt under the Pharaoh. We see a similar pattern as well with a crisis for the whole Jewish nation when the golden idol was set up; and the three men along with Daniel refused to worship it. Daniel himself ignored an edict about praying toward Jerusalem which put him in the lion's den. To be willing to die rather than serve men; Christ (the 4th man in the fire) was exalted and edicts went out that anyone who did NOT honor the God of Israel was to have their houses made into a "dunghill" ( Daniel 3:29). The edict of King Ahasuerus was also a game changer; to bring about God's preservation of His people.
Are you saying, that as Stephen was being stoned to death (under Paul's supervision);
Jesus who is SEATED at the right hand of God, STOOD up as Steven died. Acts 7:55-56
The Bible says he's seated, but in this event He stood up... ? Anyone wanna bet that Steven did not descend to a place of holding. After this event, Paul was blinded, knocked off his horse, and questioned by Jesus, "why are you persecuting ME?!"
Acts 6:8
And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people.
Acts 6:9
Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen.
Acts 7:59
And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my SPIRIT.
Acts 8:2
And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.
Acts 11:19
Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only.
Acts 22:20
And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also (Saul) was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him.
There's is no doubt that Stephens spirit is in heaven now.
""I reject your thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation""
Bill You're going to Love this!!
I reject my thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation also!!
Guess why, I never thought that, In fact mever said it either. You would have to go back maybe a week Past your first response and pull up a separate thread then come forward to this thread and you will see I went to great lengths to show why I believe " A body of believers called out of all nations is a nation of its own, called the Church. It is what will be raptured up. There is no geographic land mass we can call a holy nation.
But Israel ( in a different way )
Here is the comment you're referring to:
"A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different"
This was a sarcastic rebuttal to that notion embodied in a larger statement that shouldn't have been mistaken.
There was another thread that went on for a day or two displaying foolish pride that needed to be dealt with.
That's when I started a separate thread with the rebuttal.
You may have missed that because maybe a day or so later you responded and again today.
When people cite non-Bible books (man's opinion) to 'prove' a point, it usually has little credibility. Just turn on the TV or read a newspaper and most of what is written is unsubstantiated opinion or pure falsehoods. Society seems more corrupt and more willing to lie and deceive than any other time in my lifetime. The lies and propaganda is so blatant, but somehow they have been successful in silencing and cancelling any voices that tell the truth. It's similar to how many communist dictatorship countries got their start.
So, when I hear someone adamantly saying the US was not a Christian nation then says a few authors of history books said so, I don't believe it. I instead believe the evidence of historical documents quoting the Bible, of speeches quoting scripture, of monuments honoring God and scripture, of our dollar bill which still says in God we trust, of our pledge of allegiance which has God in it. Yes, some were Masons too, but most were Christians who desperately wanted freedom. Now, we have pro-communist people trying to destroy the country and limit your freedom that so many fought and died for. So, yes, this is a Christian nation, is still, but has fallen greatly. Immorality and sin will be it's demise, however, just like how Rome or many other powerful entities fell. No anti-conservative or anti-Christian propaganda will change my mind on what the truth is. If someone is confused on what the truth is they should seek God and pray.
"A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different."
I just read your response at this late date. I reject your thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation. I do accept the fact that at it's inception, it was a nation "of" professing Christians primarily dominating the society, and as such, that faith should be reflected in the character of it's elected leaders and issues of governance.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
John Adams, 2nd President of the United States
Therein lies the American delemma today.
Those who blame the government have very little understanding of how it is supposed to work. As recently retired I have expanded my reading time and quite a few books have handled American history, politics and western cultural development. This site is not the place to go into the many interesting things I've learned, but I do wish to leave you with one smattering of facts. At the time of the Civil War the majority of American churches taught a covenant theology and truely believed that victory of the church in world affairs would usher in the return of Christ. Also, the "Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection", by Charles Darwin was hailed as science advancing knowledge and lent support to the position of racial descrimination that has so inflamed our society to this very day. Ironically Lincoln's party was no less discriminatory than the southerners and carried that fault in their political stance well into the 1920's. Only after the Civil War did the Federal government begin to swell into the massive financial and intrusive monster it is today.
Given a chance to sit down and discuss these and more matters, I can imagine more agreement between us.
One more pre-America tidbit, look up the 1746 destruction of the French fleet and the connection to Boston.
Thank you so very much, Mr. Bowman for your, very in-depth and spirit filled answer. You have truly Blessed me with your Comment/Answer back to me, as I am, through this, able to see another angle per se.
See, I was told, when I asked this question of a popular and, in my opinion extremely spirit-filled and informative Pastor, that when we return to Earth, riding behind Christ, we won't NEED to fight with The Lord as "out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword," as mentioned in Rev.19:15. Furthermore, he stated, rather coyly that Jesus would "take care of business, not needing us."
Personally, I see things much differently and feel there is a purpose for us, returning with Christ; why else would it be mentioned? Armies! However, it does not expound, really, on the subjection, with our, the Saints involvement? Now, I did read this sites Commentary where the verse is broken down. Basically, it says that the example used is when the Roman Generals paraded the Army with the Captives behind. Somehow, Sir, I don't feel this is what is conveyed. Every mention of the "Armies," Biblically speaks to the Men who fought alongside, i.e., Joshua or David, etc., so why would one conceive any other train of thought?
I am able to humble myself and am only trying to learn but this is actually important to me as myself and all of my 5 Sons, are Warriors. In other words, I've long felt that we, collectively would fight, side by side with our King. I thank you, so very much for your time and attention and again, I want to learn, not in contradiction but spirit-filled!
Barbara, the Spirit is gracing you with HIS wisdom and His Understanding. What the Spirit is revealing to you about the armies described in Revelation 19:14 is correct, we are those armies. The armies described in Revelation are much different than the armies we know which are made up of men in their natural state.
1 Corinthians 15:46 Howbeit that WAS NOT FIRST which is spiritual, but that which is NATURAL; and afterwards that which is SPIRITUAL.
1 Corinthians 15:44 It is sown (at natural birth) a NATURAL body; it is raised (at Christ resurrection) a SPIRITUAL body (we are delivered into this body the moment we depart our natural body). There is a NATURAL body, and there is a SPIRITUAL body.
John 16:21 A woman (the church) when she is in travail hath sorrows (suffers in the flesh), because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she rememberth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.
There are many, many symbols that describe the called out: the elect, the saints, the anointed ones, the church, the temple, the house of God, the trees, the books, the rivers, the streams, the mountains, the house of Israel, the house of Jacob, the chosen, the called, the faithful, the horses, the chariots and many more. When the Spirit causes you to understand the symbols it becomes easier for the Spirit to reveal His truths.
Isaiah 9:5 For every (natural) battle of the (natural) warrior is with confused noise, and garments rolled in blood; but this (spiritual battle) shall be with (spiritual) BURNING and FUEL of (spiritual) FIRE.
Isaiah 9:19 and the PEOPLE shall be the FUEL of the FIRE
Isaiah 4:3-6 (vs 4)When the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion (another symbol of the called out) and shall have purged the blood of Jerusalem (another symbol of the called out) from the midst thereof by the SPIRIT OF JUDGEMENT and by the SPIRIT OF BURNING.
This is what the armies (the ones gone before us) are doing.
Joe, blessing in Jesus' name, the name above every other name.
God has made covenants with various people as recorded in The Bible: Some of them are...
Noahic Covenant - an unconditional covenant never to destroy the earth again by flood.
Abrahamic Covenant - an unconditional covenant to bless him, make him a great nation, bless all nations through him and give him the Promised Land
Mosaic Covenant - a CONDITIONAL covenant that IF the people of Israel completely obeyed God, they would be blessed by God, but if they didn't, they would receive curses from God.
Davidic Covenant - an unconditional covenant the his reign and throne would last forever.
The New Covenant - an unconditional covenant to give Israel a new heart to obey Him, live in the Promised land forever and enjoy God's presence, a covenant that New Testament believers share in.
Notice that only one is a conditional covenant: the covenant with Moses and Israel at Mount Sinai. This covenant has been replaced by The New Covenant, since Jesus was the fulfillment of the Mosaic Law. Keeping The Law is not a means if grace. Rather it condemns us. "The Law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." This covenant included the dietary restrictions like not eating the blood or fat of animals. These civil, ceremonial and dietary laws were only addressed to Israel and are not in any way a requirement for New Testament believers. The apostles addressed thus issue at the Jerusalem Council as recorded in Acts 15.
Today, the blood is usually drained from the carcass before the meat is aged and butchered. I'm not really sure whether ingesting large amounts of blood is harmful but I'd guess that's so. But we are under no such prohibition from God as stated in the Scriptures.
We actually agree, The short of it is ,I opened up with a question, quoting " Why do we " Blame " the government for our own behavior?
You see we got a constitution created with biblical principles as you said and I agree.
The constitution can't change the heart of the individual just like the law couldn't change the heart of a jew. He's a jew outwardly not inwardly,
Individually the Holyspirit should govern our hearts. The jews was never able to accomplish the law, and Righteousness wasn't to come by it, tho they was inspired and never amended. Its called the ministry of condemnation, And we was never able fulfill the constitution yet it was amended 27 times I think. We are now in the Church age, The spirit takes residents in us we're without out excuses so as an individual Christian we can't blame the Government. but as a nation its scary because we should have a greater influence than any other country, A Christian is known by the love we have for one another, as A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different.
Other countries see us no different than them. Israel was called a degenerate vine, The LORD is the true vine the church is the branches, we bare fruit because we're connected to him not the nation.
Why do we blame the Government for our own behavior? We site racism, Abortion, Same sex Marriage, slavery ect... We Legalized these sins and and close our eyes to the sin of hatred and Division. Since some of these sins is Glossed over and some legalized, YOU AS A CHRISTIAN CANT PLACE THE BLAME ON THE WORLDS GOVERNMENT, WHEN GODS LAW SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN YOUR HEART.
Take Daniel Daniel,Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego; these men didn't abandon God in Babylon. They were in a foreign land and so are you.
The difference is we help build this country the way it is, "" ALL OF US""
King David I know he had his own sins as we all do but his heart was right with God, ""a repented heart""
He was a great king when it comes to leading a nation in the statutes of Gods laws. ( HE DID WHAT WAS RIGHT IN THE EYES OF THE LORD ALL HIS DAYS )
Do you think if he was our president we would be a better nation? Don't we have an advantage on that Era? ( We have the Holyspirit in us to direct our Lives individually to form a nation barring fruit.
A Jew would celebrate Purim & do so joyfully as he is brought into remembrance of the great deliverance of the Jews by the Hand of God, through His servant, Esther. As a Christian, I would have no need to celebrate this event but only to bear it in mind for historical understanding & of the working of God in the affairs of men. My special event is when I break bread in fellowship with the saints, in remembrance of my great deliverance from the depths of sin & captivity in Satan's domain.
Truly, I may be wrong in my thinking but, I feel, in my spirit and my gut tells that we, i.e., the Saints, which I think it's safe to assume is the Church, will indeed FIGHT right along with our King, Jesus Christ upon His return to Earth. All along, the Biblical typologies, woven through scripture, have indicated that the Army's have had many a battle, correct? They fought and died, along with Joshua & David, another typology just like our Messiah. So, why would it be that the Saints & Angels, returning with Jesus at the Battle of Armageddon would not fight, tooth and nail right alongside our Lord?
Rev. 19:14 "And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean." And, then, in verse 19, it reads, "And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army."
Wouldn't it be your belief or understanding that we ARE the ARMY of Christ and we will fight alongside The Word? I've been told that I am wrong, but, it is merely common sense. Do you agree? Thank you!
Shayla Wells, The God of Israel, who isn't mentioned in the book of Ester, used Mordecai to accomplish his will. God often is "unseen", yet present, in the affairs of this world. Foresight is our least accurate form of vision, whereas, hindsight and insight fare/work better.
We are not told specifically in the Scriptures as to why Mordecai, Esther's cousin, chose her to come before the king. My thoughts are that Mordecai, already in a prominent position in Shushan (the palace), wanted to have a Jewish presence right there near the King's Throne. He may not have known it at the time, but it seems that God was leading Mordecai to offer Esther to the king as his wife, that in the days ahead, she would be instrumental in the salvation of her people, the Jews. In any other situation, the wicked Haman would have got his way with the king & the Jews there would have been destroyed.
And he brought up Hadassah, that is, Esther, his uncle's daughter.
Moses
She's the girl of morals, thanks uncle Mordecai???? Esther's uncle or yours (Moses).
When I read the book of Esther. I glorified the Lord God ! Almighty. He is the alpha and the omega, the beginning, and the end. The great deliverer! That why the psalmists Say's in the of 57 verse 2. Which says " I will cry unto God most high,; Unto God that performeth all things for me, He shall send from heaven, and save me. Esther cried, the Lord answered. Esther obed obedience brings blessi
Questions as to why specific writings became 'apocrypha' and subsequently removed from the original KJV is simply that content therein cemented the foundation of the word giving greater understanding. A time for everything and everything has a time.
You are replying to a comment by "Charlie Slaves"
If you read from Genesis to Revelation their is a common theme. The Promise seed Genesis 3:15, Israel Gods chosen people , The coming one the messiah, Israel's disobedience and captivity, Jehovah ( Psalm 83:18) mercy and delivering his people from captivity because they repented. Even the book of Ruth played a part in the symbolic descendant role in the promise seed
Matthew 1:5.
How does the book of Esther add up? this book talks about Jews being in Shushan. The Jews were always in captivity by their enemies for their deliberate disobedience to Jehovah- Nehemiah 13:23-31; Esther 2:6 (Exile). Esther didn't have a choice; she was in exile or in captivity as while and taken to the kings house- Esther 2:8. Jehovah god blessed this situation because they relied on him when Haman tried to scheme or plot to destroy all the Jews Esther 3:5-15. This book is accurate because it matches the other books regarding Jews being in captivity or exile.
When you read the apocrypha does it match the bibles overall theme? does this puzzle pieces match?
does it complete the whole picture?
I hope this answers your question. Thank you
Titus 2:3-5 also is relevant here; as is 1 Peter 3:6 among other verses which show God's plan for women to be exalted.
The record of Mordecai of the attempted assault of the two chamberlains showed how the Jews were to be commended for helping with the security of the King; and this record would help the "humble to be exalted" as it were at a later date to vindicate Mordecai. (see ( Matthew 23:12). This attitude of service was repeated with Daniel in exile in Persia under Nebuchadnezzar; and Joseph in Egypt under the Pharaoh. We see a similar pattern as well with a crisis for the whole Jewish nation when the golden idol was set up; and the three men along with Daniel refused to worship it. Daniel himself ignored an edict about praying toward Jerusalem which put him in the lion's den. To be willing to die rather than serve men; Christ (the 4th man in the fire) was exalted and edicts went out that anyone who did NOT honor the God of Israel was to have their houses made into a "dunghill" ( Daniel 3:29). The edict of King Ahasuerus was also a game changer; to bring about God's preservation of His people.
Esther 4:1-16
Esther 4:11, (the law was death sentence) with 1 exception) The king hadn't asked to see her for over 30days,
Esther 2:19
Also significant history : Daniel 1:1, They were captives of war
Esther 2:5-7, Esther 2:10, Daniel 9:1, Daniel 6:8, Daniel 6:16-17, Ezra 4:6-24,
Hopefully these are helpful in your study.
Then, he ask her not to reveal that she is a Jew. V( Esther 2:10)
Genesis 4.
The wonderful thing is, there is no respect of person with the Lord. There's no doubt all our spirit goes straight to be with the Lord. Amen!!
Jesus who is SEATED at the right hand of God, STOOD up as Steven died. Acts 7:55-56
The Bible says he's seated, but in this event He stood up... ? Anyone wanna bet that Steven did not descend to a place of holding. After this event, Paul was blinded, knocked off his horse, and questioned by Jesus, "why are you persecuting ME?!"
Acts 6:8
And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people.
Acts 6:9
Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen.
Acts 7:59
And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my SPIRIT.
Acts 8:2
And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.
Acts 11:19
Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only.
Acts 22:20
And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also (Saul) was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him.
There's is no doubt that Stephens spirit is in heaven now.
Note: Acts 5:29-33
Mishael
""I reject your thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation""
Bill You're going to Love this!!
I reject my thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation also!!
Guess why, I never thought that, In fact mever said it either. You would have to go back maybe a week Past your first response and pull up a separate thread then come forward to this thread and you will see I went to great lengths to show why I believe " A body of believers called out of all nations is a nation of its own, called the Church. It is what will be raptured up. There is no geographic land mass we can call a holy nation.
But Israel ( in a different way )
Here is the comment you're referring to:
"A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different"
This was a sarcastic rebuttal to that notion embodied in a larger statement that shouldn't have been mistaken.
There was another thread that went on for a day or two displaying foolish pride that needed to be dealt with.
That's when I started a separate thread with the rebuttal.
You may have missed that because maybe a day or so later you responded and again today.
So, when I hear someone adamantly saying the US was not a Christian nation then says a few authors of history books said so, I don't believe it. I instead believe the evidence of historical documents quoting the Bible, of speeches quoting scripture, of monuments honoring God and scripture, of our dollar bill which still says in God we trust, of our pledge of allegiance which has God in it. Yes, some were Masons too, but most were Christians who desperately wanted freedom. Now, we have pro-communist people trying to destroy the country and limit your freedom that so many fought and died for. So, yes, this is a Christian nation, is still, but has fallen greatly. Immorality and sin will be it's demise, however, just like how Rome or many other powerful entities fell. No anti-conservative or anti-Christian propaganda will change my mind on what the truth is. If someone is confused on what the truth is they should seek God and pray.
"A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different."
I just read your response at this late date. I reject your thought that America is or ever was a Christian nation. I do accept the fact that at it's inception, it was a nation "of" professing Christians primarily dominating the society, and as such, that faith should be reflected in the character of it's elected leaders and issues of governance.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
John Adams, 2nd President of the United States
Therein lies the American delemma today.
Those who blame the government have very little understanding of how it is supposed to work. As recently retired I have expanded my reading time and quite a few books have handled American history, politics and western cultural development. This site is not the place to go into the many interesting things I've learned, but I do wish to leave you with one smattering of facts. At the time of the Civil War the majority of American churches taught a covenant theology and truely believed that victory of the church in world affairs would usher in the return of Christ. Also, the "Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection", by Charles Darwin was hailed as science advancing knowledge and lent support to the position of racial descrimination that has so inflamed our society to this very day. Ironically Lincoln's party was no less discriminatory than the southerners and carried that fault in their political stance well into the 1920's. Only after the Civil War did the Federal government begin to swell into the massive financial and intrusive monster it is today.
Given a chance to sit down and discuss these and more matters, I can imagine more agreement between us.
One more pre-America tidbit, look up the 1746 destruction of the French fleet and the connection to Boston.
See, I was told, when I asked this question of a popular and, in my opinion extremely spirit-filled and informative Pastor, that when we return to Earth, riding behind Christ, we won't NEED to fight with The Lord as "out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword," as mentioned in Rev.19:15. Furthermore, he stated, rather coyly that Jesus would "take care of business, not needing us."
Personally, I see things much differently and feel there is a purpose for us, returning with Christ; why else would it be mentioned? Armies! However, it does not expound, really, on the subjection, with our, the Saints involvement? Now, I did read this sites Commentary where the verse is broken down. Basically, it says that the example used is when the Roman Generals paraded the Army with the Captives behind. Somehow, Sir, I don't feel this is what is conveyed. Every mention of the "Armies," Biblically speaks to the Men who fought alongside, i.e., Joshua or David, etc., so why would one conceive any other train of thought?
I am able to humble myself and am only trying to learn but this is actually important to me as myself and all of my 5 Sons, are Warriors. In other words, I've long felt that we, collectively would fight, side by side with our King. I thank you, so very much for your time and attention and again, I want to learn, not in contradiction but spirit-filled!
Have a Blessed day, Mr. Bowman!
Most Humbly,
Barbara
1 Corinthians 15:46 Howbeit that WAS NOT FIRST which is spiritual, but that which is NATURAL; and afterwards that which is SPIRITUAL.
1 Corinthians 15:44 It is sown (at natural birth) a NATURAL body; it is raised (at Christ resurrection) a SPIRITUAL body (we are delivered into this body the moment we depart our natural body). There is a NATURAL body, and there is a SPIRITUAL body.
John 16:21 A woman (the church) when she is in travail hath sorrows (suffers in the flesh), because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she rememberth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.
There are many, many symbols that describe the called out: the elect, the saints, the anointed ones, the church, the temple, the house of God, the trees, the books, the rivers, the streams, the mountains, the house of Israel, the house of Jacob, the chosen, the called, the faithful, the horses, the chariots and many more. When the Spirit causes you to understand the symbols it becomes easier for the Spirit to reveal His truths.
Isaiah 9:5 For every (natural) battle of the (natural) warrior is with confused noise, and garments rolled in blood; but this (spiritual battle) shall be with (spiritual) BURNING and FUEL of (spiritual) FIRE.
Isaiah 9:19 and the PEOPLE shall be the FUEL of the FIRE
Isaiah 4:3-6 (vs 4)When the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion (another symbol of the called out) and shall have purged the blood of Jerusalem (another symbol of the called out) from the midst thereof by the SPIRIT OF JUDGEMENT and by the SPIRIT OF BURNING.
This is what the armies (the ones gone before us) are doing.
God has made covenants with various people as recorded in The Bible: Some of them are...
Noahic Covenant - an unconditional covenant never to destroy the earth again by flood.
Abrahamic Covenant - an unconditional covenant to bless him, make him a great nation, bless all nations through him and give him the Promised Land
Mosaic Covenant - a CONDITIONAL covenant that IF the people of Israel completely obeyed God, they would be blessed by God, but if they didn't, they would receive curses from God.
Davidic Covenant - an unconditional covenant the his reign and throne would last forever.
The New Covenant - an unconditional covenant to give Israel a new heart to obey Him, live in the Promised land forever and enjoy God's presence, a covenant that New Testament believers share in.
Notice that only one is a conditional covenant: the covenant with Moses and Israel at Mount Sinai. This covenant has been replaced by The New Covenant, since Jesus was the fulfillment of the Mosaic Law. Keeping The Law is not a means if grace. Rather it condemns us. "The Law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." This covenant included the dietary restrictions like not eating the blood or fat of animals. These civil, ceremonial and dietary laws were only addressed to Israel and are not in any way a requirement for New Testament believers. The apostles addressed thus issue at the Jerusalem Council as recorded in Acts 15.
Today, the blood is usually drained from the carcass before the meat is aged and butchered. I'm not really sure whether ingesting large amounts of blood is harmful but I'd guess that's so. But we are under no such prohibition from God as stated in the Scriptures.
All of us means both political parties.
We actually agree, The short of it is ,I opened up with a question, quoting " Why do we " Blame " the government for our own behavior?
You see we got a constitution created with biblical principles as you said and I agree.
The constitution can't change the heart of the individual just like the law couldn't change the heart of a jew. He's a jew outwardly not inwardly,
Individually the Holyspirit should govern our hearts. The jews was never able to accomplish the law, and Righteousness wasn't to come by it, tho they was inspired and never amended. Its called the ministry of condemnation, And we was never able fulfill the constitution yet it was amended 27 times I think. We are now in the Church age, The spirit takes residents in us we're without out excuses so as an individual Christian we can't blame the Government. but as a nation its scary because we should have a greater influence than any other country, A Christian is known by the love we have for one another, as A Christian nation it shouldn't be no different.
Other countries see us no different than them. Israel was called a degenerate vine, The LORD is the true vine the church is the branches, we bare fruit because we're connected to him not the nation.
"The difference is we help build this country the way it is, "" ALL OF US""
If you want to include yourself, I don't know you well enough to object,
however, "all" is an accusation against brethren, and we both know who
is famous for that.
America is one of the least ungodly nations on Earth. The bedrock is
the Constitution, created with biblical principles in the minds of the
writers. It is a contract between the people who understand their
political rights come from God, and the government. The people agree to comply
with the government when the government follows the Constitution/law. The
problem we have today is that the governing bodies are departing from
following the Constitution. You can't legislate people to be saved.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people". It is
wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams
Too many Americans are strangers to the word of God.
To your point, believers have a part in shaping our society but the decline
in morality is not something "all" believers must bear. I am persuaded that
laodicean lukewarmness is on the rise in representing the church in the
world today. A seduction of wealth and goods has blinded many a local
church from seeing it's need for a lord to rule and a purpose to accomplish.
That church is neither hot/soothing or cold/refreshing to our Lord. Workers
in the harvest are sparse and that ought not to be. All is not lost, because
our Lord is still offering Laodiceans gold, to repentent ones.
It is laziness to project the end of times is near and all world wrongs will be
righted in some biblical cataclysmic event, when instead, working to increase
the harvest of souls is indeed something of our Lords will we know pleases him.
That repentence could usher in a revival of the true church with godly believers.
Why rant/vent here?
Take Daniel Daniel,Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego; these men didn't abandon God in Babylon. They were in a foreign land and so are you.
The difference is we help build this country the way it is, "" ALL OF US""
King David I know he had his own sins as we all do but his heart was right with God, ""a repented heart""
He was a great king when it comes to leading a nation in the statutes of Gods laws. ( HE DID WHAT WAS RIGHT IN THE EYES OF THE LORD ALL HIS DAYS )
Do you think if he was our president we would be a better nation? Don't we have an advantage on that Era? ( We have the Holyspirit in us to direct our Lives individually to form a nation barring fruit.
Who's Governing you?
Rev. 19:14 "And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean." And, then, in verse 19, it reads, "And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army."
Wouldn't it be your belief or understanding that we ARE the ARMY of Christ and we will fight alongside The Word? I've been told that I am wrong, but, it is merely common sense. Do you agree? Thank you!
Respectfully,
Barbara J Moore
Moses
She's the girl of morals, thanks uncle Mordecai???? Esther's uncle or yours (Moses).