Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80/sess_0v3jpelkeinv24gm35k8k4vdvm, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2
Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2 BIBLE DISCUSSION THREAD 150843
Yes, the 1611 KJV was the original version as authorized by King James. So it's written with the old English spellings of the time (in the days of Geoffrey Chaucer & the Canterbury Tales era) & maybe some other slight grammatical changes. The KJV we have now is exactly the same as the 1611 version, but with the more modern spellings. But even this has now become little difficult for the 'younger set' to read. Then I would suggest the New King James Version or another related accurate rendering: the New American Standard.
If you want to try reading from the 1611 version, then click on More on the top Tab on this Site & scroll down to it.
If you want to try reading from the 1611 version, then click on More on the top Tab on this Site & scroll down to it.
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?