Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80/sess_rasmiu5lk2plonnu6jh4r8lbb1, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2

Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2
BIBLE DISCUSSION THREAD 154960

Bible Discussion Thread

 
  • Virginia on Genesis 1 - 3 years ago
    I am a Christian, and am currently reading Genesis. How do we Christians differentiate between what God is sayingabout creation and what science is saying about evolution. Your advice is appreciated.
  • Adam - In Reply on Genesis 1 - 3 years ago
    Hello, science supports the Bible's account of creation and vice versa. There is lots of scientific evidence of events of the Bible like the creation, flood, archeology from Bible times, dates, times, family history. If a book was fake it would be sparse on detail, but the Bible is filled with huge detail and the dates and timelines have all proven to be accurate and credible.

    But there's a difference between real science and fake 'science' which is just a label some use for their religion. There are plenty of scientists who believe in God and creation. But some will believe theories with zero evidence and call it science, because they got a bachelor's degree and feel their opinion somehow matters more. Most are just uncomfortable with the idea that an intelligent being created them so they do mental gymnastics to try to explain away God. They don't believe an accident made a Picasso painting, or an accident designed a building, but when it comes to something far more intelligent and complicated, they blindly say it was unintentional accident. Without evidence they believe their life is the result of an accidental explosion. But that is not scientific, because life from an explosion has never been witnessed and cannot be reproduced. The brightest minds on earth cannot produce life manually, nor through an explosion, so the idea that an accident caused it violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Yet, people still believe it on faith (religion) despite zero evidence, and say it's science, but it isn't science.
  • Robert - In Reply on Genesis 1 - 3 years ago
    You will need to view Creation and its details from a Hebraic (or "Ancient Ee") perspective as many of the scientific truths get lost in foreign thought (i.e. Westernized). For example, the true Hebrews (Ee peoples -many of which currently dwell in West Africa and their Bantu diaspora in South Africa) show evidence of a "flat earth" and closed "dome" system design to the world. Writers like Albert B. Ellis unwittingly showed that this belief was held among the Ee peoples when he studied them during the late 19th century. See the first page of Chapter 3 of his book titled "The Ewe Speaking People's of the Slave Coast of West Africa." Although the Ee had fallen into idolatry (as prophesied would happen to this chosen people- Deut 32:16-17) long before A.B. Ellis' exposure to their culture, some core Torah (Mosaic) based beliefs and customs were certainly apparent among them. In short, the original cultural perspective of truth sheds a critical light on Scriptural science so that it may be distinguished from unfounded secular pseudo-scientific beliefs. All knowledge has a context. Scriptural Science has a cultural-spiritual context which must be considered.
  • Adam - In Reply on Genesis 1 - 3 years ago
    "You will need..."

    Maybe only you do. God and His word of are all people need. Romans 1:20 God bless.



This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.

Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
 

Do you have a Bible comment or question?


Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!