Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80/sess_0h45hmvbvj9l5rp29ui4diau3s, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2
Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2 BIBLE DISCUSSION THREAD 194837
The commissioning of the King James Bible (hence the name) was authorized so by King James 1 in 1604.
Why the King James Version instead of other Bibles? For me, accuracy plays a large role in what scripture is to us -- especially given this was translated to English out of many other ancient languages (ancient Hebrew, Aramaic, koine Greek, etc). However, the origin of the texts which Erasmus had used when translating the New Testament (for instance) of the King James Bible comes from an Antioch text. This text was much older and authenticated which was for a time hidden during the Byzantine wars. The text of translation of 98% of modern Bibles comes from an Alexandrian text which was found later in Egypt and is clearly missing verses which are in the Antioch (King James Bible). For instance (do some research on this for comparison), the NIV is a very popular modern Bible version which was first published in the 1960's. Yet, it's missing over 15 verses in the N.T. alone.
We should never be reading an incomplete Bible or one in which verses had been removed as I would equate this to the warning in Revelation 22:18 & 19
Why should i choose kjv than other versions of bible?
Why the King James Version instead of other Bibles? For me, accuracy plays a large role in what scripture is to us -- especially given this was translated to English out of many other ancient languages (ancient Hebrew, Aramaic, koine Greek, etc). However, the origin of the texts which Erasmus had used when translating the New Testament (for instance) of the King James Bible comes from an Antioch text. This text was much older and authenticated which was for a time hidden during the Byzantine wars. The text of translation of 98% of modern Bibles comes from an Alexandrian text which was found later in Egypt and is clearly missing verses which are in the Antioch (King James Bible). For instance (do some research on this for comparison), the NIV is a very popular modern Bible version which was first published in the 1960's. Yet, it's missing over 15 verses in the N.T. alone.
We should never be reading an incomplete Bible or one in which verses had been removed as I would equate this to the warning in Revelation 22:18 & 19
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?