King James Bible
King James Version (KJV)
![King James Bible King James Bible KJV](../images/king-james-bible-kjv.png)
Viewing page: 5 of 6
< Previous Discussion Page Next Discussion Page >
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Since you are asking for thoughts from anybody, I would like to share mine. This word generation in Matthew 24:34 has no association with years at all. The word generation means race or kind of people. GENEA is the word, and it means a race or kind of people.
Some theologians have said that the word "generation" means 40 years. Today, people attach different numbers of years to this word generation. Some say 70, some say more. But it doesn't have anything to do with a number of years.
There have been books written by people that have said that generation meant a certain number of years and that when Israel became a nation in 1948, they figured 40 years from there that the rapture was going to happen in 1988.
Well, 1988 passed and it didn't happen. But someone wrote a book on it and made millions of dollars. And then when it didn't happen, they wrote another one as to when the next one would be.
But GENEA has nothing to do with years. It is a race or kind of people.
Basically, what Jesus is saying here, is this kind or race of people, (the Jews), shall not pass away until all these things be fulfilled. They are His elect. They are His protected people, His chosen people, and He will fulfill His promises to them.
I used to believe that the word generation used in Matthew 24:34 meant a certain number of years. But now I understand it differently. There is no way I can come to any other conclusion on this word GENEA.
This word has no association to a number of years. It means a race or kind of people, specifically the Jewish race.
If we choose to change the word GENEA to mean a number of years, and we use 1948 as the beginning of that number, then we can know for sure the year that Jesus will return. Jesus says no one knows, nor can we know. There Bible gives no clues for us to determine the year or time of His return.
One thing we can know is that the Jewish race (GENEA) will not pass until those things be fulfilled.
That's the way I have it in that verse also.
I believe it's used like that here in Genesis 6:9-10 also.
"These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth."
Also here in Genesis 36.
Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.
Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite;
AND THIS GROUP IF PEOPLE GOES ON UNTIL YOU GET TO
Genesis 36:9 and it gives a list of those of Esau in mount Seir.
"And these are the generations of Esau the father of the Edomites in mount Seir:"
IT'S USED THAT WAY IN
GENESIS 37:1-2 ON JACOB'S GENEALOGY.
When you look up the word GENEA, do you not see the word race in the definition. I read Greek and I know what the word means. So I do believe what I said is correct.
If you believe it is referring to years (70 or 80) as in your post, and you are saying that this generation began in 1948, and we already know that 70 years have already gone by. 80 years will be another 5 years from now. So do you believe Christ is coming back in 5 years?
I trust you when you say that you believe the word of God. I would never question another believer as to whether they believe the word of God based on what I might perceive as a misunderstanding, or questionable interpretation. Do you think it's possible for a believer to believe that word of God is true but yet interpret the word incorrectly? I believe so. I speak for myself when I say this, but I believe God's word is absolute truth, but I also realize that it is always possible that I can misunderstand and misinterpret.
However, we do have a different understanding of the word generation (GENEA) used in Matthew Chapter 24. It seems clear to me that Jesus is speaking to the Jews. I do not see anything that would indicate tome that Jesus is telling the Jews that a generation is referring to a certain number of years, and that they could use that number to figure out the timing of His return. In fact, if He was speaking about a number of years when He used the word generation, the Jews at that time would have understood it to be about 30 years, definitely not 70 or 80. If you research the life expectancy of people during that time, the time Jesus spoke those words, it would have been 30-35 years of age. So, if that is the case, and you are using 1948 as the beginning of "this generation," He should have returned somewhere around 1978. Many people throughout the ages have tried to predict when His return would be based on generation meaning a set number of years.
I still stand on the literal definition of the word GENEA, which refers to a race or kind of people. And just so you know, I do respect your view!
(Part 2): If I may comment on a couple things you said, first about Matthew 24:29-31. You say that "Many people think that's the same event as Jesus' return riding a white horse, they say the elect are the Jews," and "It is not the same event, and these elect that are gathered together are not the Jews. They are the bride of Christ, the church."
If you are saying that the rapture of the church and Christ's second coming are two separate events, then I agree with you on that. As far as the word "elect," this is a special word brought over from the Old Testament as a title for the Jewish people. They are His elect people. I agree that the church is the bride of Christ, but we are not the elect. The elect are the Jews. That's what they were called in the Old Testament and that's what they always will be, God's elect. I find no scripture reference in the New Testament that shows where the meaning of the word elect has been changed to mean someone other than the Jews?
You also said that "The Jews don't believe Jesus is the Son of God." That is not completely true. Many did not believe, but there are many who did. Almost all of the 12 original apostles were Jews. I'm sure they believed who Jesus was. Matthew also was a Jew. Peter himself, being a Jew, he confessed that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the living God.
Please know that I am in no way wanting to argue with you. I am simply sharing with you what I understand from my study of scripture. I know you are doing the same and I appreciate anything and everything you wish you share. We may or may not always agree, but there's always something we can learn from each other. I have been posting here for about five years now, and many here have an idea of what I believe and don't believe. I think you are fairly new here, so we have not learned much from each other as far as what our beliefs are. I hope to learn more about your beliefs. Thank you for sharing!
Please allow me to make a correction.
Pains of birth: first 3-1/2 years of the Tribulation.
Perils of tribulation: the last 3-1/2 years of the Great Tribulation.
Since you are replying to me, you do not need to send me any of the Strong's Concordance numbers, or definitions of Greek words. I do read Greek so I knew what was meant by those words. If this was intended for anyone else, then my apologies.
I will respond to your other post as soon as I can. It won't be today as I am spending time with family tonight, going to enjoy the Super Bowl.
You have a great evening!
To answer your question, yes, I do believe in a pre- tribulation rapture of the church. However, I do not base that belief on Matthew 24:29-31. I base my belief on what I read in 1 Thessalonians Chapter 5.
Here's something I think is important to understand about end time prophecy:
All prophecies concerning the last days are based upon Daniel 9:24-27, which presents the 70th week of Daniel. And the 70th week of Daniel is divided into four section:
1) Pains of birth: first 3 years of the Tribulation. ( Matthew 24:4-14)
2) Pivotal point: the mid-point of the Tribulation. ( Matthew 24:15)
3) Perils of tribulation: the last 3 years of the Great Tribulation. ( Matthew 24:16-28)
4) Promise of his coming: the Second Coming of Christ. ( Matthew 24:29-32)
All end time prophecy is centered on the Jewish people.
I can give you my understanding of Matthew 24:29-31, but only if you are interested.
Now I do have a question for you. In one of your posts, you say the elect are not the Jews, but the bride of Christ, the church. But in your current post, you are telling me that the elect are the children of Israel.
Am I missing something here?
Jimbob,
In Acts 1:10-11, when the Lord ascended up into Heaven, the angel said why do you disciples look up into heaven? Why are you gazing up there? This same Jesus will come in like manner. He will come in the clouds. The actual event recorded is in Revelation 19:11-16, the second coming of Christ. He comes with power and great glory. Revelation 24:31 tells us that when He does come, He shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet.
I am going to get technical for a moment, just to show how good this passage really is. He is going to send His angels out with a great sound of a Shofar. It's a ram's horn. In the Greek text, the word "sound" is in brackets, which means it has been added to the text by some unseen person who doesn't understand the fact that the word "great" modifies the trumpet. It is called a great Shofar. The prophecy is in Isaiah 27:12-13. It says the great Shofar will blow, and the Lord will gather His people from the four corners of the earth.
So that is very important because that's a prophecy that the Jews looked for. It says He is going to gather them together, (his elect), that would be the Jews, from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other, north, south, east, and west.
This is my understanding of this section of Matthew.
You began this thread by ending your post with "Any thoughts, anybody?"
Well, I shared my thoughts and your first reply was to tell me I was wrong. And now you are implying that my eyes are blinded to the truth?
You say that none of us have all the answers and that is true. But why is it that if we disagree with each other, I am the one that's wrong, and I am the one who is blind to the truth?
How would you feel if I were to tell you that I would pray that God would open your eyes to the truth? So, we are in disagreement, and God has opened your eyes to the truth but blinded mine, and you feel the need to pray that He will open mine?
I do appreciate prayer, but in this case I don't see it as being necessary. It's not because I believe I am right and you are wrong. I just don't see a need for another believer to ask God to open my eyes to the truth of His word. That should be the responsibility of each and every believer before they approach God's word. It is the individual believer that should open up in prayer, prior to the study of God's word, by asking Him to open their own eyes to the truth.
I think we can both agree that this conversation is not going to change what either of us believe, so I don't have any more "thoughts" that I wish to share.
No worries. I wouldn't say that I am offended. I've been told that I was wrong before. You're not the first. You are the first person however to insinuate that my eyes have been blinded to the truth. And as far as being "deceived," by believing in a pre-tribulation rapture, I don't think I'm being deceived at all. You see, like you, I also believe God's word is true. Like you, I let the Word of God be my final authority. Like you, I believe scripture interprets itself.
I do have one more question for you. If this 7-year tribulation period happens in our lifetime, and you believe the church will go through not only the first half, but also the last 3-1/2 years known as the Great Tribulation, what do you believe our function will be as a church while God's wrath is being poured out on this earth?
Again, I am not offended. If we disagree with each other then we just disagree. I have no problem with you simply telling me that you disagree. That sounds much better than insinuating that my eyes have been blinded to the truth.
Your thoughts are worth giving consideration. I agree that what one has been taught will influence how they interpret Scripture. That is why we have so many viewpoints. It is good to take these different ideas and study them to see if they align with Scripture. Learning how those who adhere to their viewpoint support it and also learning how those who hold a different view explains their objections to that which they do not hold to is good to do.
We all need to be humble, teachable, discerning, and able to recognize the lead of the the true Holy Spirit in matters of doctrine and practice. The history of the church over the centuries is riddled with differing views and doctrines on many important Scriptural teachings. God has given the church over the centuries many men who have been blessed with strong intellectual skills shaped by faith that have rebutted false ideas and also intelligently explained Scriptural truths to believers throughout history. The Apostle Paul is one of those men so gifted and used of God as a gift to the church. The church has a long history of similar men, not that their words are inspired Scripture, but, like Paul, they have been gifted intellectually in order to give a reasoned, measured, thoughtful, and seasoned defense of the faith once and for all handed down to the church.
Please don't take this the wrong way because it's just an observation. GiGi said that "Your thoughts are worth giving consideration." You respond back with "please don't see what I post as my thoughts"
I can understand why you said that, but what seems odd is that you began this thread by posting what you see as truth, and then at the end of your post, you ask for our "thoughts."
So is what we post considered our thoughts? I mean, that's what you asked for, our thoughts?
I stand with what I said concerning thoughts. Anything one posts that is not the words of Scripture are one's own thoughts . To think otherwise is disingenuous, in my opinion. I do check out the Scriptures cited and reflect on it along with the thoughts posted by the poster. As to being more open to instruction, I agree! I have learned a great deal since entering this forum over a year ago. However, I do think that there are some tenets taught in Scripture that we can be sure of and be convinced are true. We should have confidence in the Holy Spirit to confirm matters of faith in us.
I believe you are correct regarding the sequence of events. The return of Christ, the Resurrection, the Rapture, and the beginning of Judgement Day are simultaneous events occurring IMMEDIATELY after the Great Tribulation. Matt 24 and other passages are very clear about that.
The Great Tribulation is a spiritual event. It is not a time of unusual physical suffering and is not a political event involving specific nations of the world.
I believe we are currently living in that day, as I have posted earlier.
Thank you for the reply. I guess we're just going to have to remain in disagreement. If the Lord returns during our lifetime, and you believe you will be here during the tribulation, then I do wish you all the luck. As for me, I don't believe I will be here.
Have you every considered that you might not be seeing, we all fall into this sin.
John 9:41 Jesus said unto them, If you were blind, you should have no sin: but now ye saw WE SEE; therefore your sin remaineth.
God Bless You!
We are constantly seeing; but not seeing.
This is all God's doing, we repent of our seeing; but not seeing, as he causes light to shine into darkness, if your not constantly repenting of you beliefs an growing in wisdom and understanding, your not maturing in the word.
We started learning by what our elders taught us, they most often are still in darkness, also, it's hard to repent of mans teachings, because we think our parents and pastors KNOW, which is probably not true.
As you study ask yourself; did I learn this from MAN, or the teaching of the SPIRIT.
Remember the whole world has been deceived, only the Spirit can bring you to TRUTH: It'a all the WORK of God, not man.
God Bless YOU!
I understand the importance to test all things according to the Word of God. And I do think that we mature as believers over time and there is need to discard some viewpoints on Scripture and doctrines in favor of more accurate understanding.
I differ with you in that I will not despise the teachings of my parents, pastors, or others I know in the Lord who trained me up in the faith. This is the function of these people. To think that a person alone, and without outside instruction from seasoned believers can rightly interpret the Scriptures unerringly is a false and dangerous idea. It opens one up to all sorts of imaginings that go against God's word. I am not saying that the Spirit does not teach us truthfully. He does, but this is often through interaction with other believers with the Word. Loners tend to fall into great error and those who insist that they do not need to consider the teachings of other believers leads one to be unteachable even before the Holy Spirit.
I agree with you, I was raise in a church, taught by my parents, pastors, Sunday school teachers: this is all God's work, part of the plan of God, everyone posting on here, and those reading those post, is part of God's plan, but most people just stop with the basic, the milk, and never mature, able to digest the WORDS.
I was taught, believe in Jesus and you go to heaven, don't believe and go to hell, this is a far cry from what the WORD teaches about THE KINGDOM.
As we mature we should encourage other to get off MILK.
God has a plan for everyone in his creation, and through HIS knowledge and wisdom, all will eventually submit themselves to Christ, and God will be all in all.
Eternity is a long time; is it linear, or a circle?
In God's eyes IT'S ALREADY DONE.
I was blessed with far more instruction about God, our Lord, salvation, our Christian walk, and much much more by my parents and my church growing up. So, I come from a different perspective than you. I think it is certainly common over the centuries and today for believers to become mature within the church and home setting. So, it is probably a good idea, perhaps, to speak to your own lack of instruction growing up that did not lead you to maturity rather than give an outright statement that impugns the role and function of the teachings we receive from parents, pastors, teachers, fellow believers, and our own walk with God throughout those years by saying does not mature believers.
I do understand the need to "own" one's faith when we become adults by studying for ourselves the Word and measuring that against the Scriptures. There certainly is a great need to disciple teens and young adults who have grown up in a Christian home and church along with new believers whatever their age. The goal is to be brought to maturity, whatever the manner that God chooses to do so.
God's blessing on you, Ruby.
As you asked, here is what I can share on Matthew 24:29-31. I will need more than one post to give you, my understanding.
(Part 1)
These verses speak of the promise of Jesus' second coming. Understanding the 7-steps of a Jewish wedding helps give a better understanding of Christ's second coming, and also some of the Jewish views about when Christ is coming back. If you would like for me to send you what the 7-steps are, I will do so. It is very interesting, I promise! They are literal steps of a Jewish wedding, and they parallel the things spoken of in Matthew's gospel.
So, reading through Matthew 24:29-30, it says that immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun will be darkened, the moon will not give any light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn.
Now the word "tribes" is very important. That tells us that we are talking about Jewish people. It is a Jewish term. All the tribes of the earth shall mourn. And they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. All the tribes! Again, that would be Jews.
In Revelation 1:7, it tells us that every eye will see Him, even those who have pierced Him. Zechariah 12:10 is a prophecy that the Jews hold to, only they don't understand its application. It says that when Messiah comes, they will look upon Him whom they have pierced.
So, at this time when Christ comes (at His second coming), the Jews who are left on the earth, they are going to mourn, and they are going to look and go "Oh no, we crucified our Messiah, and here He is!" They are going to recognize Him. And we see in Verse 31 that the Lord's going to round them all up. It says in this verse that He's going to come upon the clouds of heaven. That's given to us in Daniel 7:13.
To be continued...
I'm sorry, but I cannot agree with you that the term elect is referring to the church. We are the bride of Christ. I agree to that. But we are not the elect. Going all the way back to the OT, the term elect is a title referring to the Jews. The church was not in existence when the Jews were given this title. They are God's elect, His chosen people. Looking at Matthew 24:22 which says "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened."
If God did not have a time period when He says okay, I am going to stop, everybody would be wiped out. But for the sake of the elect, which again is special word brought over from the Old Testament as a title for the Jewish people. They are His elect people. It does not mean they are all saved. They are His chosen people, His idea, and He has chosen them out. And He realizes there are 144,000 of them out there, plus all the others who believed, and this is something that is going to happen at the last part of the tribulation period. Those days will be shortened for the 144,000 Jews. The church will not be here.
In Revelation Chapter 11, John says that at the second coming of Christ, all of Israel will be saved. That is what that verse makes reference to. At His second coming, all of the Jews at that time will be saved. So, God shortened the days, 3 years, just so His own people (His elect) could survive.
You are asking for my understanding of Matthew 24:29-31, so I will share that with you in a separate post as there is not enough space here to do so.