Bible Discussion Thread

Why would any leader want their ambassadors to represent them with Renaissance words?

The H.G.is a living being that has to be born in us...Jesus said that the Father will send the H.G. in my Name implying that Jesus is the father of the H.G....Thats y Isaiah refers to Christ as everlasting Father in 9:6...Thats y he is saying whosoever receives one such child in my name RECEIVES ME...And unless you receive the Kingdom of God as a lil Child you will in no wise enter there in...She brought forth a man child that is gonna rule all nations.... Rev 12:10...Thus the Child is a kingdom Child...And is the essence of the New Birth....Baptism of the H.G. The only baptism of Promise....Behold i send the Promise of my father upon you which was the baptism of Promise...He is the 3 rd person of the trinity thus a heavenly Jacob...Thus an Israel of God is on the horizon...The 3 rd person of the Davidic trinity was Solomon....But Jesus says a greater then Solomon is here ...Thus he will build a greater temple then Solomon in our hearts ( the Kingdom )...When Jesus said that which is BORN of spirit is Spirit...Thats the H.G. the Child of Promise....Jesus is his Father simply b/c the H.G. cannot be born in us without the seed of Jesus the living words of that book that he wrote with his own blood....That New Covenant in the Fathers right hand is Jesus and his words...Thats y he has to know us, its gotta be by his seed the living words of that book....ok lemme go GBU....Thus Jesus is truly the father of the H.G....Thats y Isaiah refers to Jesus as everlasting father...They don't call him the bridegroom for nothin.

While the one saved with goofy Renaissance KJV words is important, what about the multitudes of ones that listen to the koine-like common language of today better?

That is a very interesting question which I would love to try and answer ! Please give more details and I will do my best to help out :) .

I am sorry for not asking my question more like "When God chose New Testament words, koine Greek, the language of the common people, was chosen. Would this choice be contradicted with an uncommon 'Thou shalt not', etc.?"