Bible Discussion Thread

 
  • S Spencer - 1 year ago
    COMPARING PREMILLENNIAL AND AMILLENNIAL VIEW POINTS.

    Part 4.

    Continuing from Jeremiah 30:7-12.

    There is no good reason for not taking this exactly as it is written, namely, that David will be raised from the dead and will with Christ reign over the people of Israel in the millennium. Even if David is understood to refer to Christ as David's greater Son, it is still a clear reference to a future millennium rather than to a situation that exists today.

    In Jeremiah 33:14-17 we have another account where Jeremiah as do Daniel, looks past the captivity of Babylon on into the future in the latter days.

    "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised unto the house of Israel and to the house of Judah.

    In those days, and at that time, will I cause the Branch of righteousness to grow up unto David; and he shall execute judgment and righteousness in the land.

    In those days shall Judah be saved, and Jerusalem shall dwell safely: and this is the name wherewith she shall be called, The LORD our righteousness.

    For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel;

    Ezekiel 37:22-25.

    in Ezekiel's days David had been dead over four hundred years and that this is a prophecy that David will be raised from the dead prior to the millennial reign of Christ and share with Christ the rule of the people of Israel. Something quite foreign to the Church age.

    Anther issue which is often debated concerning the fulfillment of the Davidic covenant is the fact that for many years the throne was unoccupied.

    From the time of the Babylonian captivity on there was no literal earthly kingdom. This, however, is taken into full consideration in the Word of God in Hosea 3:4-5.

    See Part 5.
  • Jema - In Reply - 1 year ago
    May I ask a question without wishing to be impolite ? Your posts in this series are very familiar to me , it seems I've read them before , have you perhaps posted them previously on here ? Or maybe I've read them on another website or in a book ? It's driving me crazy to know why they are so familiar to me :) .
  • S Spencer - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Hi Jema.

    Why would I declare it impolite?

    However, No and Yes to your answer. I've posted similar series like this but as far as I can remember not this indebted on this site. Only fragments.

    However I've taught it in my Sunday school class a couple years ago and discussed it

    I gathered material over the years from the scripture, web, preaching, teaching ect... It never ends.

    As noted in the original post It's to serve as a way we can examine our hermeneutics and a few other things.

    This is not a hard series to do but time consuming.

    From Genesis 12 on to Acts 2 , most of what you have is about Israel.

    That's a lot of scripture for them not to be prominent.

    The focus is on Gods future plan for Israel and the Covenant promises is what this is all about!

    This should be familiar and not hard to research,, there's a lot said about it whether by scripture, web television ect.

    We gather and pass it on.

    God bless.

    You may have seen fragments of the topic from off this site or
  • Jema - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Thanks S.Spencer , I spend quite a bit of time going through the older posts so I'm guessing that's why your post are so familiar to me , I've been reading you and a few others recently but they are older posts :) keep it up please .
  • S Spencer - In Reply - 1 year ago
    You're welcome Jema.

    And thank you.

    As for T Lewis and Mishael,

    I believe T Lewis left the site and dropped in a little while ago if I'm not mistaken, but Mishael just stopped posting and responding all of a sudden and never returned.

    That is shocking considering the commitment.

    Blessings
  • GIGI - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Hello S. Spencer and Jema.

    I remember Mishael saying he was ill in the weeks before he stopped posting. He was very committed to participating here and so I continue to pray for him.

    We miss him and T. Levi's and Suze, and Bro Dan, and Dr. Lee, and many other we have not heard from on here for some time.

    It is good to keep praying for them when they come to mind.
  • Jema - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Thanks for the info Gigi , I spend a lot of time reading old posts so when I come into the latest ones I wonder where the others went . I guess people move on and have busy lives etc . I'm just glad that so many of them left their mark on here for us all to read , hopefully for many years to come , until God's Kingdom . Thanks to everyone from times gone by , for leaving such a wealth of love and insight , may God bless you all where ever you are .
  • GiGi - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Hi Jema,

    I am wondering how you get to older postings on this site.

    Can you tell me the steps you take?

    Thank you
  • Jema - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Yes , I'm on my mobile phone , so I click on ' view all ' and that shows me all the latest comments , at the bottom of the page there are numbers taking me back to previous pages , each time I click on a previous number and look at that page , the numbers change at the bottom of the page , so I just keep clicking on the highest number and that takes me back to nine years ago . Hope I made that understandable :) .
  • GiGi - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Thanks Jema
  • S Spencer - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Wow Gigi.

    I didn't know Mishael was ill.

    Sad to hear that.

    Thank you.

    God bless.
  • GiGi - In Reply - 1 year ago
    I remember him mentioning this at the time his sister passed away.
  • S Spencer - In Reply - 1 year ago
    COMPARING PREMILLENNIAL AND AMILLENNIAL VIEW POINTS.

    By way of recap we're comparing the way these two groups interpret the scripture surrounding the Abrahamic and Davidic Covenants.

    Part 5.

    In Hosea 3:4-5. before the Babylonian captivity, it was predicted: "For the children of Israel shall abide many days without king or Prince...

    "Afterward SHALL THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL return, and seek the LORD their God, and David their king; and shall fear the LORD and his goodness in the latter days.

    Hosea 3:5

    Also;

    Amos 9:11.

    Zachariah 14:4.

    Zachariah 14:9.

    This of is not a contradiction of the fulfillment of the Davidic covenant, but is a part of the same picture.

    and many more OT references.

    LET'S REVIEW THE NEW TESTAMENT.

    According to Luke 1:30-33 the angel Gabriel told Mary that she is to be the mother of Christ and Christ will reign on the throne of His father David over the house of Jacob.

    To Mary "the house of Jacob" could mean only one thing and that is the descendants of Jacob, namely, the twelve tribes of Israel.

    It seems the disciples and others anticipated much the same kind of a literal fulfillment.

    Matthew 19:28.

    Matthew 20:20-21.

    Luke 22:29-30.

    Acts 1:6-7. The disciples were still anticipating an earthly kingdom and hoped for its immediately.

    Christ did not say that their hope was vain and that there was not going to be a literal fulfillment. He replied: "It is not for you to know the times or seasons, which the Father hath set within his own authority."

    But He directs their attention to the immediately task before them, and to the power of the Holyspirit Spirit and proclaim the Gospel to the whole world.

    Now this is where the line is drawn from dealing with Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

    Confirming verses at the council in Jerusalem in Acts 15:13-17.

    More on this later.

    God bless.
  • S Spencer - In Reply - 1 year ago
    Part 6.

    REVIEWING THE NEW TESTAMENT CONSIDERING PREMILLENNIAL AND AMILLENNIAL VIEW POINTS.

    In the previous section I left off discussing the council in Jerusalem mentioned in Acts 15:13-17 and Paul's writings in Romans 11:25.

    These verses is concerning what become of Israel and the Covenant promises while the Church age has begun.

    This tempts me to revisit the OT and usher in Daniel 9:24-27 at this junction but I will save that for now.

    The focus is on Gods future plans for Israel and the timing and location of the Kingdom reign of Christ.

    Some call it the Millennium reign or Millennium kingdom which can unfortunately confusing.

    Millennium is a Thousand years.

    That's just how long Satan will be chained.

    Christ reign is everlasting. We must no mistake the Millennium for eternity. There's still sin, chastening and death in the Millennium. Christ rule with a rod of iron. Eternity is entirely different.

    The Millennium is a time of testing.

    There's a final rebellion by Man after the Devil is loosed for a season.

    The statement in Acts 15:13-17 is drawn from Amos 9:11-12 which has been debated.

    Amillenarians sought to make this a contradiction of the premillennial point of view.

    It seems that "after these things I will return" refers to the return of Christ after the period of Gentile prominence which began in 606 B.C. and is destined to continue until the second coming. It is "after these things" judgment on Israel, their scattering, and discipline that Christ will return and build again the tabernacle or tent of David. The reference to the tent of David does not concern itself with any building but rather with the political power and sway which David had.

    Amos 9:14-15 debunks that,

    Especially verse 15. "And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the LORD thy God."

    It's bedtime for me.

    I will continue at a later time.

    God bless.



This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.

Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
 

Do you have a Bible comment or question?


Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!