Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80/sess_htcpudood1a9od2jjf8g9l4ti7, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2
Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2 BIBLE DISCUSSION THREAD 224125
The true gospel is circumscribed by the Bible, alone and in its entirety, the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments, in its original languages. The King James Version is translated from the oldest and most reliable manuscripts available, and the translators have sought to stick as closely as possible to the original text, which is in stark contrast to the modern translations that use inferior manuscripts and seek to reinterpret the original text and put it in more understandable language. That said, the KJV is far from perfect, it does contain errors, and the KJV translators were heavily influenced by the doctrines of the church, which when viewed from the superior vantage point of our day when we are very near the end of time and God is opening our understanding to many truths that were previously kept sealed ( Daniel 12:4,9), were very often faulty. Therefore, the serious Bible student should always carefully check the original languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek using the modern tools that are readily available, such as interlinears and concordances, which are keyed to the KJV.
By definition, any gospel that cites an authority that is outside the 66 books of the Bible, or narrower than the Bible, is false. That includes gospels that look upon other books as divinely inspired or that feature the teachings of those who claim to have received direct revelation from God, whether in a dream or a vision or tongue, as in the tongues described in 1 Corinthians 14.
Revelation 22:18-19
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I do agree with you concerning the modern versions of the "bible". The KJV is the only one to be trusted but I do want to challenge you in your belief that it contains errors. I know from other comments you have made that you are a
Calvinist so are you saying the KJV has errors because it doesn't that doctrine.
Do you accept the premise that the KJB was inspired by the Holy Spirit? (the word inspired first came into use in the 14th century and "it had a meaning it still carries in English today: to influence, move, or guide by divine or supernatural influence.") Merriam Webster Online. If the Holy Spirit of God was not able to influence the men who wrote the KJB, if He made mistakes, how do we know the men who wrote the word in their original languages didn't make mistakes? Since words of the ancient languages have different meanings, how do we know those men used the correct one, and why didn't the Holy Spirit correct them when it inspired them to produce the KJB? I hope you don't thing these are frivolous questions? You have probably been asked them before but I sincerely would like you to communicate with me on this. Bye
The true gospel is circumscribed by the Bible, alone and in its entirety, the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments, in its original languages. The King James Version is translated from the oldest and most reliable manuscripts available, and the translators have sought to stick as closely as possible to the original text, which is in stark contrast to the modern translations that use inferior manuscripts and seek to reinterpret the original text and put it in more understandable language. That said, the KJV is far from perfect, it does contain errors, and the KJV translators were heavily influenced by the doctrines of the church, which when viewed from the superior vantage point of our day when we are very near the end of time and God is opening our understanding to many truths that were previously kept sealed ( Daniel 12:4,9), were very often faulty. Therefore, the serious Bible student should always carefully check the original languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek using the modern tools that are readily available, such as interlinears and concordances, which are keyed to the KJV.
By definition, any gospel that cites an authority that is outside the 66 books of the Bible, or narrower than the Bible, is false. That includes gospels that look upon other books as divinely inspired or that feature the teachings of those who claim to have received direct revelation from God, whether in a dream or a vision or tongue, as in the tongues described in 1 Corinthians 14.
Revelation 22:18-19
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Continued in part 2
I do agree with you concerning the modern versions of the "bible". The KJV is the only one to be trusted but I do want to challenge you in your belief that it contains errors. I know from other comments you have made that you are a
Calvinist so are you saying the KJV has errors because it doesn't that doctrine.
Do you accept the premise that the KJB was inspired by the Holy Spirit? (the word inspired first came into use in the 14th century and "it had a meaning it still carries in English today: to influence, move, or guide by divine or supernatural influence.") Merriam Webster Online. If the Holy Spirit of God was not able to influence the men who wrote the KJB, if He made mistakes, how do we know the men who wrote the word in their original languages didn't make mistakes? Since words of the ancient languages have different meanings, how do we know those men used the correct one, and why didn't the Holy Spirit correct them when it inspired them to produce the KJB? I hope you don't thing these are frivolous questions? You have probably been asked them before but I sincerely would like you to communicate with me on this. Bye
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?