Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80/sess_psndv6dhgp141rq0nqgha749uc, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2
Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/lsphp/session/lsphp80) in /home/kjv.site/public_html/Discussion-Thread/index.php on line 2 BIBLE DISCUSSION THREAD 953
@Ryan...I think you missed my point, no actually you completely did. I did say we evolve...but not in the Darwinesque lying fashion. Do people and animals/species adapt to their surroundings? Do they evolve as entities? Absolutely!! That is nature in its basic form. Did we evolve from a single celled organism? At Mr Rourke's Fantasy Island, sure that is a possibility, but here in the real world, not a chance.
You are wrong when you state; "This statement shows that you don't know the basic principles of evolution." It is you who needs to go back and do some studying.
The whole premise (I substitute "Lie" here) Darwin placed his argument on, was that species have and continue to evolve their biological development...i.e. monkey to man. While that is a simplistic breakdown. It is the essence of his "Lie". Our bodies are a intricate organism that continue to baffle the greatest minds of our time. If you break it down to where the rubber meets the road. Our heartbeats without the assistance of any electronic machines, our brains compute/store a massive amount of knowledge without the assistance of any computer. Our lungs inhale and exhale independent of our daily thought.
If you believe that the development of these bodies are a result of a magical theory of evolution? Well, you're entitled to that, but our basic level of intelligence would understand. That these bodies where a well thought out (but not perfect, we are still of the flesh) creation.
Also, to be accurate, I wasn't suggesting that "Cloning" and "Evolution" are one in the same. I was citing cloning to point out the manipulative nature, one will go to to fill their pockets "In the Name of Science". Or their twisted interpretation of it, that is..
By the way Ryan as far a "Fossils" are concerned. Are you suggesting that I subscribe to the horrible lie, that this world is only 6-8 thousand years old?
On the contrary, it isn't possible to know the exact age of the "Earth", but Hundreds of Billions of years would be a good start. However, this world age (there was one before this age)? I'd estimate based on the knowledge we have in God's word; 14 thousand years. If you sit down and think about it, that is pretty close to any and all scientific studies concerning "Carbon Dating".
It's amazing how accurate God's Letter to us is, when we read with understanding. As I have stated above. God's Letter to us aka The Bible is accurate (when rightly divide) and complete. It takes time an effort to study (that means you actually read it and not take bits and pieces to falsely depict it, or others interpretations), but as with all things; If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.
Note: It is not meant for all to understand God's Letter. So, I'm not sure why so many try to force feed people? Jesus (Emmanuel "God with us") spoke in Parables for a reason...
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment to start a new comment thread.
Enter new comment
You are wrong when you state; "This statement shows that you don't know the basic principles of evolution." It is you who needs to go back and do some studying.
The whole premise (I substitute "Lie" here) Darwin placed his argument on, was that species have and continue to evolve their biological development...i.e. monkey to man. While that is a simplistic breakdown. It is the essence of his "Lie". Our bodies are a intricate organism that continue to baffle the greatest minds of our time. If you break it down to where the rubber meets the road. Our heartbeats without the assistance of any electronic machines, our brains compute/store a massive amount of knowledge without the assistance of any computer. Our lungs inhale and exhale independent of our daily thought.
If you believe that the development of these bodies are a result of a magical theory of evolution? Well, you're entitled to that, but our basic level of intelligence would understand. That these bodies where a well thought out (but not perfect, we are still of the flesh) creation.
Also, to be accurate, I wasn't suggesting that "Cloning" and "Evolution" are one in the same. I was citing cloning to point out the manipulative nature, one will go to to fill their pockets "In the Name of Science". Or their twisted interpretation of it, that is..
By the way Ryan as far a "Fossils" are concerned. Are you suggesting that I subscribe to the horrible lie, that this world is only 6-8 thousand years old?
On the contrary, it isn't possible to know the exact age of the "Earth", but Hundreds of Billions of years would be a good start. However, this world age (there was one before this age)? I'd estimate based on the knowledge we have in God's word; 14 thousand years. If you sit down and think about it, that is pretty close to any and all scientific studies concerning "Carbon Dating".
It's amazing how accurate God's Letter to us is, when we read with understanding. As I have stated above. God's Letter to us aka The Bible is accurate (when rightly divide) and complete. It takes time an effort to study (that means you actually read it and not take bits and pieces to falsely depict it, or others interpretations), but as with all things; If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.
Note: It is not meant for all to understand God's Letter. So, I'm not sure why so many try to force feed people? Jesus (Emmanuel "God with us") spoke in Parables for a reason...
All the Best~
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?